Grey School Skirt

Does instruct uniforms - good or bad?

1. Deroticed girls

As usual, the people believe that squeezing children in the school uniforms will prevent the sexual abuse, rapes, etc.

This argument type is similar to the a word that "she provoked it and she is to criticize". The people that divide this opinion should see on how big Internet of an erotic fetishism the uniform of school is for the men! The whole laugh of the people that hears that the argument will be the better proof than than I wrote am just very true. That is why I would be anxious firmly this reaction.

Unless you will persuade the ladies that does not obtain that you talk about - they probably will stare at with round eyes to you with astonishment. The results on Internet should open their eyes to this problem. The this is so typical that in the countries where the uniforms are the most popular ones - for example, Great Britain or Japan - they have connotations more erotic.

The proof for that can be found in Google. If the one looks for "the school uniform" in Google, the one encounter of the pages presenting uniforms as erotic fetishism. Nevertheless, once you insert the "schoolgirl" or "the school uniform" in Google, you will have flooded by a big number of sites of pornography! ! !

Summarize, so does not import that believes that the girls in the uniforms will be surer, has without any doubts wrong. On the contrary, this clothing type can attract just more of deviate.

2. The uniforms will prevent the ecstasy of method and vanity

Has. exacting Uniform clothing of a color and a specified cut for example the white blouse/shirt; the navy sweater/cardigan blue, the gray skirt/pants. But the school does not impose store or marks.

The "marched of models" will stop only in appearance, because the need for the individual expression cannot be eliminated by the uniforms. The children and the adolescent ones will find certainly other manners to underline their differentiation, and show their presumed superiority on the other children. Thus, if a school uniform consists in a navy a sweater blue/the cardigan/the shirt and the gray skirt/pants, a child will have the dearest, the sweater of designer/the cardigan/the skirt/pants of shirt and designer, while the other will carry old and stretched rags. Where is this equality?

The one cannot compare two just sweaters because they have the same color and it same name. The people that are still in the service to introduce uniform to the school, should familiarize itself with the experiences in this field take other countries.

To Belgium, for example, there are private schools that demand uniforms and this takes to the fanatical attitude from the children towards these clothing. That is because of the fact that while the depriving of their identity, it will turn in a complete obsession. The childlike ones in such schools prick a crisis and feel excessive pressure not only to possess the better and the clothing more fashionable, but also those of the brand "just".

As I wrote before, a gray skirt do not compare to another, even if his cut or his length firmly is determined. The commercial businesses easily use obsessions of the childlike ones and compete to produce such fresh things. It has also a fitting price!

Thus, any parent that thinks that their obsession of the children with the clothing will finish themselves, is mistaken. The it will be just the opposite, because the bans and the orders have for result the resistance. More more stricter these bans and the orders are, more the biggest resistance and the big obsession among the people of different ages than they cause. Then, not only among the adults, but also among the children and the adolescent ones.

The ban on to carry labels of designer will not change does not import what or, because the producers will find the gap in the market right away. They will begin clothing to produce without any logo, but that immediately can be recognized by the children as the better one one. The quality, just like the better cut is easily perceptible.

Those that remind of the times when they carried the school uniforms itself, should be conscious on account of the fact that they will not eliminate parades of models, the acts of competitions or condescension. The people should remember and the speech of what they did when they were this age in the order not to be deprived of their individuality. The uniforms did not change does not import what in the schools that I attended.

B. Full uniform - they are bought in a store and they are all the same quality, have the same cut, including the shoes and the bags - nevertheless, they are completely dear.

Such uniform will be outside reach for a lot of children. There will be children possessing only the one such uniform.

In order not to mention the fact that introduces identical uniforms will cause an infernal temptation of corruption. Because, that is to decide which store will furnish children with the uniforms?

Imagine the hell a child will must crosses, while possessing only a uniform? His/his uniform a more lot will be worn in the comparison to the uniform others of the children. Is so where this alleged equality? The this will be also more more more often dirtier, because it only will be washed during the weekend. And and the winter, if it not dry to Monday?

Of course, we suppose here that a child has such responsible parents that they will not forget to wash and iron the uniform. At the same time we realize that this always be not the case. There are children of which the parents will not care for any their child having an own uniform only every week. The parents have not the time, they forget, are tired, or simply the drink, etc. And while? What has such a wear child to instruct? Does a uniform salt? A wet uniform?

Of course, a child will have some uniforms and they always will be new, did not wear itself, clean, clean and to have ironed. At the same time, the others students will carry salts, made use of itself the same torn uniforms. They can be also too small, because there can be a case when the parents have not enough money to buy a child a new uniform, when the old the one does not adjust more.

We should not forget that as much of as 30% of children lives in Poland in poverty and does not have at does not import what to eat. They have not enough money for the equipment of school or the books, to say nothing of the purchase of a new uniform.
That will be only spends it additional, because everyday clothing can be found in of occasion for the groundnuts. A uniform do not can.

Outside of that, should all parents be obliged to keep their uniform of the child cleans and ironed? And themselves they do not fill to have for them? Can a child, in such a case, a wear another clothing to the school? Follow this thought, a child that has such irresponsible parents will feel surely categorized by the other children? At last, everyone will go counts that such a child have parents that do not occupy any him/she. This is a reason "ideal" to tease and persecute the child! Why should the children suffer the negative consequences of is neglected?

Nevertheless another question about presumed equality of the children in the uniforms.

There will be established right away schools that are "better" and "worse". The richer children will attend a school, and the poorest a different the one. As every school will have his own uniform, the this will be easily perceptible that that instructs a child attends. Then, there is a big probability that the children outside the ground of school will be treated with contempt, hate or jealousy.